PTI distances itself from Bushra Bibi’s controversial statement

Govt reacts to Bushra Bibi's claims: Ex-army chief, Qamar Bajwa, calls Bushra Bibi 's statement as pack of lies.

Islamabad (Newsman): Pakistan Tehreek – e – Insaf (PTI) has distanced itself from Bushra Bibi’s rare outburst wherein she hurled allegations on Saudi Arabia for ouster of Imran Khan from the power.

PTI spokesman, Barrister Saif, in a statement issued to media on Friday morning, clarified that Bushra Bibi’s last day’s statement does not reflect PTI policy and it could be taken as her personnel opinion.

Barrister Saif added that PTI founder Imran Khan, chairman Gohar Khan and the spokesman are authorised to issue any party policy statement. Barrister Saif’s clarification has come in the context of Bushra Bibi’s first political statement issued ahead of November 24 protest call.

Bushra Bibj, in her statement, had alleged that Imran Khan’s visit to Saudi Arabia barefoot as premier cost him the rule.

Read More: PTI Gives Final Call of anti-government Protest in Islamabad

Bushra Bibi had pulled former army chief, Qamar Javed Bajwa, in the controversy alleging that a phone call came to ex-army chief after Imran Khan ‘s visit to Saudi Arabia, wherein the caller showed annoyance over Imran Khan’s presence at Holy Kaaba barefoot.

The caller, according to Imran Khan ‘s spouse, told Qamar Javed Bajwa that the people like Imran Khan were not liked by Saudi Arabia. She had claimed that the said call was followed by launching of a vicious campaign against her and Imran Khan.

Also Read: Govt to Suspend Internet and Mobile in Nov 24 PTI Protest 

Bushra Bibi’s claims have received strong reaction from the government. Information minister, Atta Tatar, in his emergent presser, said Bushra Bibi’s accusations on a brotherly Islamic country (Saudi Arabia) were a pack of lies.

Retired general, Qamar Javed Bajwa, also denied getting any call from Saudi Arabia on Imran Khan’s visit to that country.

He said Bushra Bibi’s claims in this regard were totally false and unfounded.

Comments (0)
Add Comment